<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (10) TMI 931 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413879</link>
    <description>Input tax credit under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 was held admissible on mining tippers and their accessories used in mining operations and in transporting iron ore within the mining area. The Court treated the tippers as goods vehicles and capital goods, and held that the Fifth Schedule restriction on motor vehicles could not be applied mechanically where the vehicles were integral to production-related activity. The revenue&#039;s authorities were distinguished, and the earlier view allowing credit on similar goods vehicles was followed. The revisional order was set aside, the first appellate order was restored, and the assessee&#039;s entitlement to input tax credit was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Oct 2021 12:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=659225" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (10) TMI 931 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413879</link>
      <description>Input tax credit under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 was held admissible on mining tippers and their accessories used in mining operations and in transporting iron ore within the mining area. The Court treated the tippers as goods vehicles and capital goods, and held that the Fifth Schedule restriction on motor vehicles could not be applied mechanically where the vehicles were integral to production-related activity. The revenue&#039;s authorities were distinguished, and the earlier view allowing credit on similar goods vehicles was followed. The revisional order was set aside, the first appellate order was restored, and the assessee&#039;s entitlement to input tax credit was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413879</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>