<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 1717 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298257</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, reversing the CIT (A)&#039;s decision on the deletion of FD interest under the principle of mutuality. The Tribunal held that since the bank was not a member of the club, the interest received did not fall within the scope of mutuality. The judgment was pronounced on 30th September 2015 by Shri D. Karunakara Rao, Accountant Member.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2021 21:25:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=659209" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 1717 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298257</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, reversing the CIT (A)&#039;s decision on the deletion of FD interest under the principle of mutuality. The Tribunal held that since the bank was not a member of the club, the interest received did not fall within the scope of mutuality. The judgment was pronounced on 30th September 2015 by Shri D. Karunakara Rao, Accountant Member.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298257</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>