<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 1876 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298268</link>
    <description>Allegations of fabricated rent papers, a false business address, and fraudulent availment of input tax credit were treated as serious economic offences, and anticipatory bail was refused. The Court noted prima facie irregularities in the GST record, including contradictory returns, disputed transit sale claims, absence of the alleged premises or factory, and payment to a different firm than the supposed sellers. The petitioner&#039;s argument that criminal proceedings were premature because adjudication under the GST provisions had not been completed was held insufficient to justify protection, and bail was declined.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2025 12:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=659202" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 1876 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298268</link>
      <description>Allegations of fabricated rent papers, a false business address, and fraudulent availment of input tax credit were treated as serious economic offences, and anticipatory bail was refused. The Court noted prima facie irregularities in the GST record, including contradictory returns, disputed transit sale claims, absence of the alleged premises or factory, and payment to a different firm than the supposed sellers. The petitioner&#039;s argument that criminal proceedings were premature because adjudication under the GST provisions had not been completed was held insufficient to justify protection, and bail was declined.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298268</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>