https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298253 Section 28-A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 operates prospectively and is triggered only by the earliest qualifying reference award under Section 18 within the three-month limitation period; a later reference award or the Supreme Court's enhancement of compensation does not create a fresh or successive cause of action for a non-protesting claimant. Statutory benefits such as solatium and interest are consequential to court-ordered enhancement and are not independently grantable by the Collector under Section 28-A(2). The text states that the Collector lacked jurisdiction to award those benefits, the High Court could not sustain that approach, and the redetermination was treated as a nullity. en-us Thu, 17 Nov 1994 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 22 Oct 2021 17:04:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298253 Section 28-A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 operates prospectively and is triggered only by the earliest qualifying reference award under Section 18 within the three-month limitation period; a later reference award or the Supreme Court's enhancement of compensation does not create a fresh or successive cause of action for a non-protesting claimant. Statutory benefits such as solatium and interest are consequential to court-ordered enhancement and are not independently grantable by the Collector under Section 28-A(2). The text states that the Collector lacked jurisdiction to award those benefits, the High Court could not sustain that approach, and the redetermination was treated as a nullity. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 17 Nov 1994 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298253