<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (10) TMI 893 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413841</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner&#039;s order, ruling that the appellant did not provide Business Support Services (BSS) to distributors/producers. The revenue-sharing agreement was deemed a principal-to-principal transaction, not a taxable service. The Circulars cited supported the appellant&#039;s stance, and demands confirmed by the Commissioner exceeded the show cause notice&#039;s scope. Consequently, the appeals were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2022 11:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=659141" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (10) TMI 893 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413841</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner&#039;s order, ruling that the appellant did not provide Business Support Services (BSS) to distributors/producers. The revenue-sharing agreement was deemed a principal-to-principal transaction, not a taxable service. The Circulars cited supported the appellant&#039;s stance, and demands confirmed by the Commissioner exceeded the show cause notice&#039;s scope. Consequently, the appeals were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413841</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>