<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 1574 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298247</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision that Rule 11(3) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, does not apply to credit related to exported goods and that the lapsing provision does not affect credit related to capital goods and input services. The court dismissed the appeal, stating that the Revenue&#039;s questions did not raise substantial legal issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2021 08:28:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=659118" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 1574 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298247</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision that Rule 11(3) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, does not apply to credit related to exported goods and that the lapsing provision does not affect credit related to capital goods and input services. The court dismissed the appeal, stating that the Revenue&#039;s questions did not raise substantial legal issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298247</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>