<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (9) TMI 1059 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298235</link>
    <description>The Delhi High Court ruled against the Petitioner in a case concerning age discrimination in employment based on short-listing criteria. The Court found the Petitioner&#039;s imposition of an age criterion for job applicants to be discriminatory and in violation of constitutional principles of equality under Article 14. Emphasizing that age should not be the sole basis for discrimination, the Court held that such practice was arbitrary and unjustified. The judgment highlighted the importance of considering qualifications and experience rather than age alone in selection processes, ultimately dismissing the writ petition for lacking merit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2021 15:05:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=659092" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (9) TMI 1059 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298235</link>
      <description>The Delhi High Court ruled against the Petitioner in a case concerning age discrimination in employment based on short-listing criteria. The Court found the Petitioner&#039;s imposition of an age criterion for job applicants to be discriminatory and in violation of constitutional principles of equality under Article 14. Emphasizing that age should not be the sole basis for discrimination, the Court held that such practice was arbitrary and unjustified. The judgment highlighted the importance of considering qualifications and experience rather than age alone in selection processes, ultimately dismissing the writ petition for lacking merit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298235</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>