https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298233 A transfer of an heir's interest in estate property was held not to be displaced by later execution sales where the prior purchases had not been avoided in a properly constituted suit, and where the suit did not directly impeach the title within the scope of lis pendens or fraudulent transfer principles. The respondents therefore had no title to redeem the mortgage, because the appellants' earlier acquisition of the equity of redemption prevailed. As to the non-mortgaged properties under administration, the heirs could reach only the ultimate residue, and the appellants' prior purchases in the administration proceedings gave them superior title, defeating the respondents' claim to possession. en-us Fri, 11 Nov 1904 00:00:00 +0521 Thu, 21 Oct 2021 14:57:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298233 A transfer of an heir's interest in estate property was held not to be displaced by later execution sales where the prior purchases had not been avoided in a properly constituted suit, and where the suit did not directly impeach the title within the scope of lis pendens or fraudulent transfer principles. The respondents therefore had no title to redeem the mortgage, because the appellants' earlier acquisition of the equity of redemption prevailed. As to the non-mortgaged properties under administration, the heirs could reach only the ultimate residue, and the appellants' prior purchases in the administration proceedings gave them superior title, defeating the respondents' claim to possession. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 11 Nov 1904 00:00:00 +0521 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298233