<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (11) TMI 401 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298230</link>
    <description>Rule 200 of the Kerala Co-operative Societies Rules was construed as a saving provision protecting pre-existing service rights of employees in service on 1-1-1974, not merely emoluments. Accrued rights to promotion already earned under the earlier bye-laws were preserved, but a bare chance of promotion or an ungranted relaxation was not. Existing employees could continue to rely on the earlier superannuation age where that condition had already governed their service, and employees already qualified under the old rules could claim promotion to one higher post, subject to the limits of the protected pre-existing entitlement. The commentary also notes that a co-operative society not shown to be State or a statutory body was not amenable to writ jurisdiction under Article 226.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2025 10:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=659087" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (11) TMI 401 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298230</link>
      <description>Rule 200 of the Kerala Co-operative Societies Rules was construed as a saving provision protecting pre-existing service rights of employees in service on 1-1-1974, not merely emoluments. Accrued rights to promotion already earned under the earlier bye-laws were preserved, but a bare chance of promotion or an ungranted relaxation was not. Existing employees could continue to rely on the earlier superannuation age where that condition had already governed their service, and employees already qualified under the old rules could claim promotion to one higher post, subject to the limits of the protected pre-existing entitlement. The commentary also notes that a co-operative society not shown to be State or a statutory body was not amenable to writ jurisdiction under Article 226.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298230</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>