<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (2) TMI 17 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26909</link>
    <description>Estate duty inclusion depends on whether beneficial interest passes on death: the deceased&#039;s interest in Mazharunnisa Begum&#039;s estate was treated as passing to the deceased and therefore includible. A broad statutory notion of disposition also covers expenditure that extinguishes a right or liability in favour of beneficiaries, so construction of quarters for dependants and khanazadas fell within the deemed-transfer rule. Property was not excluded as held in a fiduciary capacity unless the statutory trust conditions were met. Debt deductions were also limited where the consideration was property derived from the deceased, and estate duty payable was not deductible in determining principal value. Property occupied by Sahabzadas and Sahebzadis was likewise treated as passing on death.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 12:23:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=65907" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (2) TMI 17 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26909</link>
      <description>Estate duty inclusion depends on whether beneficial interest passes on death: the deceased&#039;s interest in Mazharunnisa Begum&#039;s estate was treated as passing to the deceased and therefore includible. A broad statutory notion of disposition also covers expenditure that extinguishes a right or liability in favour of beneficiaries, so construction of quarters for dependants and khanazadas fell within the deemed-transfer rule. Property was not excluded as held in a fiduciary capacity unless the statutory trust conditions were met. Debt deductions were also limited where the consideration was property derived from the deceased, and estate duty payable was not deductible in determining principal value. Property occupied by Sahabzadas and Sahebzadis was likewise treated as passing on death.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26909</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>