<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (10) TMI 868 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413816</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the reassessment orders due to the Assessing Officer&#039;s failure to dispose of preliminary objections raised by the assessees, following the precedent set by the Supreme Court in GKN Driveshafts (India) Ltd. v. ITO. Consequently, the Tribunal did not address the merits of the additions under Sections 68 and 69, as the reassessment orders were invalidated. The appeals favored the assessees.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2021 08:17:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=659068" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (10) TMI 868 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413816</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the reassessment orders due to the Assessing Officer&#039;s failure to dispose of preliminary objections raised by the assessees, following the precedent set by the Supreme Court in GKN Driveshafts (India) Ltd. v. ITO. Consequently, the Tribunal did not address the merits of the additions under Sections 68 and 69, as the reassessment orders were invalidated. The appeals favored the assessees.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413816</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>