<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (10) TMI 856 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413804</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld duty liability but set aside confiscation and redemption fine. The personal penalty on the Director was annulled due to insufficient evidence of direct involvement in the diversion of goods. The order was pronounced on 13/10/2021.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2021 08:17:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=659056" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (10) TMI 856 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413804</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld duty liability but set aside confiscation and redemption fine. The personal penalty on the Director was annulled due to insufficient evidence of direct involvement in the diversion of goods. The order was pronounced on 13/10/2021.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413804</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>