https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298222 A writ petition was held maintainable against a co-operative society where the liability to repay matured fixed deposits was expressly admitted and the dispute concerned only enforcement. The Court rejected the argument that the depositor had to pursue the statutory remedy under Section 69 of the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, because that route was relevant only where a real dispute existed. Authorities dealing with disputed claims or public-duty questions were distinguished. The Court further stated that statutory authorities must act when a society fails to honour admitted financial obligations, and writ relief may be moulded to secure repayment with consequential action. en-us Wed, 05 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 21 Oct 2021 08:15:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298222 A writ petition was held maintainable against a co-operative society where the liability to repay matured fixed deposits was expressly admitted and the dispute concerned only enforcement. The Court rejected the argument that the depositor had to pursue the statutory remedy under Section 69 of the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, because that route was relevant only where a real dispute existed. Authorities dealing with disputed claims or public-duty questions were distinguished. The Court further stated that statutory authorities must act when a society fails to honour admitted financial obligations, and writ relief may be moulded to secure repayment with consequential action. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 05 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298222