https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298213 Bail was upheld after the Court considered the accused's custody status, the trial stage, examination of key prosecution witnesses, the State's assurance of timely trial completion, and conditions imposed to ensure compliance. Criminal antecedents alone were not treated as enough to deny bail, particularly where protection had already been provided against alleged threats. The Court also noted that any breach of bail conditions could lead to cancellation and that the trial court could act on a fresh complaint of threat. On these facts, the order granting bail was not interfered with and the appeal was dismissed. en-us Mon, 16 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 09 Oct 2023 10:59:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298213 Bail was upheld after the Court considered the accused's custody status, the trial stage, examination of key prosecution witnesses, the State's assurance of timely trial completion, and conditions imposed to ensure compliance. Criminal antecedents alone were not treated as enough to deny bail, particularly where protection had already been provided against alleged threats. The Court also noted that any breach of bail conditions could lead to cancellation and that the trial court could act on a fresh complaint of threat. On these facts, the order granting bail was not interfered with and the appeal was dismissed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 16 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298213