https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413788 The Court granted the Standing Counsel time to file a counter affidavit and scheduled the next hearing in two months. A stay was ordered on the payment of GST by the petitioner until further notice, with clarification that statutory deposits need not be refunded during proceedings. The petitioner challenged the levy of GST on mining lease royalty, citing a Supreme Court order on a related issue. The constitutionality of Section 174 of the CGST Act was not raised in the petition, though its impact was noted. en-us Mon, 18 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 27 Mar 2025 14:20:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413788 The Court granted the Standing Counsel time to file a counter affidavit and scheduled the next hearing in two months. A stay was ordered on the payment of GST by the petitioner until further notice, with clarification that statutory deposits need not be refunded during proceedings. The petitioner challenged the levy of GST on mining lease royalty, citing a Supreme Court order on a related issue. The constitutionality of Section 174 of the CGST Act was not raised in the petition, though its impact was noted. Case-Laws GST Mon, 18 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413788