<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (10) TMI 819 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413767</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the application seeking early listing and hearing of MA(Comp. Act)/65/CHE/2021 under Sections 241 and 242 of the Companies Act, 2013, as it was already being heard. The case involved disputes among shareholders leading to oppression and mismanagement, with issues arising from alleged abuse of veto power and the need for a Special Audit to determine the correct debt amount of NTADCL. The Tribunal highlighted the complexity of the case due to various legal proceedings and interconnected issues before different courts, ultimately dismissing the application on grounds of maintainability without addressing the case&#039;s merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2021 09:11:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=658961" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (10) TMI 819 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413767</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the application seeking early listing and hearing of MA(Comp. Act)/65/CHE/2021 under Sections 241 and 242 of the Companies Act, 2013, as it was already being heard. The case involved disputes among shareholders leading to oppression and mismanagement, with issues arising from alleged abuse of veto power and the need for a Special Audit to determine the correct debt amount of NTADCL. The Tribunal highlighted the complexity of the case due to various legal proceedings and interconnected issues before different courts, ultimately dismissing the application on grounds of maintainability without addressing the case&#039;s merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413767</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>