<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 1911 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298203</link>
    <description>Where an effective statutory revisional remedy is available under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, writ jurisdiction may be declined and the party directed to pursue that remedy. In this matter, the challenge arose from a demand and connected notice relating to detention and release of goods, but the Court required the petitioner to approach the revisional authority instead of entertaining the writ on merits. Liberty was granted to file a revision within the stipulated time, and the revisional authority was directed to decide it on merits in accordance with law, taking note of the earlier order. The impugned order was kept in abeyance until the revision is decided, if filed in time.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2021 09:10:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=658938" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 1911 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298203</link>
      <description>Where an effective statutory revisional remedy is available under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, writ jurisdiction may be declined and the party directed to pursue that remedy. In this matter, the challenge arose from a demand and connected notice relating to detention and release of goods, but the Court required the petitioner to approach the revisional authority instead of entertaining the writ on merits. Liberty was granted to file a revision within the stipulated time, and the revisional authority was directed to decide it on merits in accordance with law, taking note of the earlier order. The impugned order was kept in abeyance until the revision is decided, if filed in time.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298203</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>