https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413748 Parity in GST transitional credit matters required similar assessees to receive identical relief. The Karnataka High Court treated the petitioner's case as substantially similar to an earlier Division Bench decision that had allowed additional time to submit GST TRAN-1, and extended the same treatment. The petitioner was permitted to file or revise GST TRAN-1, either electronically or manually, within thirty days. The writ petition was allowed only to that extent, on the principle that like cases must be treated alike. en-us Wed, 25 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 27 Mar 2025 15:58:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413748 Parity in GST transitional credit matters required similar assessees to receive identical relief. The Karnataka High Court treated the petitioner's case as substantially similar to an earlier Division Bench decision that had allowed additional time to submit GST TRAN-1, and extended the same treatment. The petitioner was permitted to file or revise GST TRAN-1, either electronically or manually, within thirty days. The writ petition was allowed only to that extent, on the principle that like cases must be treated alike. Case-Laws GST Wed, 25 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413748