<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (11) TMI 20 - PATNA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26891</link>
    <description>The High Court held that interest on hire-purchase should be assessed on the accrual basis rather than the realisation basis. The court determined that the assessee followed the accrual or mercantile system of accounting based on the treatment of accrued interest in the books. Relying on precedents and emphasizing the importance of the accounting method over explicit admissions, the court rejected the Tribunal&#039;s finding of the realisation basis. The judgment was unanimous, disposing of the reference without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 11:49:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=65889" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (11) TMI 20 - PATNA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26891</link>
      <description>The High Court held that interest on hire-purchase should be assessed on the accrual basis rather than the realisation basis. The court determined that the assessee followed the accrual or mercantile system of accounting based on the treatment of accrued interest in the books. Relying on precedents and emphasizing the importance of the accounting method over explicit admissions, the court rejected the Tribunal&#039;s finding of the realisation basis. The judgment was unanimous, disposing of the reference without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26891</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>