<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (10) TMI 790 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413738</link>
    <description>The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes. The Tribunal upheld the treatment of the Rs. 5 crores investment as a capital loss and confirmed the addition under Section 41(1) of the Income Tax Act. The issues regarding Lee deposits and miscellaneous deposits were remitted back to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2021 16:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=658880" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (10) TMI 790 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413738</link>
      <description>The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes. The Tribunal upheld the treatment of the Rs. 5 crores investment as a capital loss and confirmed the addition under Section 41(1) of the Income Tax Act. The issues regarding Lee deposits and miscellaneous deposits were remitted back to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413738</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>