<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (10) TMI 772 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413720</link>
    <description>Interpretation of the SAD refund notification under Notification No. 102/2007-Cus was central, with the dispute also covering whether the refund claim could be rejected as time-barred. The text states that the refund condition was capable of more than one reasonable construction, so the interpretation favourable to the assessee was applied. On that basis, denial of the refund on limitation grounds was found unsustainable, and the SAD refund was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2021 08:23:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=658862" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (10) TMI 772 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413720</link>
      <description>Interpretation of the SAD refund notification under Notification No. 102/2007-Cus was central, with the dispute also covering whether the refund claim could be rejected as time-barred. The text states that the refund condition was capable of more than one reasonable construction, so the interpretation favourable to the assessee was applied. On that basis, denial of the refund on limitation grounds was found unsustainable, and the SAD refund was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413720</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>