<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (2) TMI 20 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26888</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the Revenue, holding that the interest paid by the firm to its partners on fictitious hundi loans is not deductible under section 40(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court affirmed the separate assessment treatment of registered firms and their partners, emphasizing the distinct entity status of a firm for income-tax purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 11:38:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=65886" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (2) TMI 20 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26888</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the Revenue, holding that the interest paid by the firm to its partners on fictitious hundi loans is not deductible under section 40(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court affirmed the separate assessment treatment of registered firms and their partners, emphasizing the distinct entity status of a firm for income-tax purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26888</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>