<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (10) TMI 762 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413710</link>
    <description>Entertainment tax under the Karnataka Entertainment Tax Act could not be imposed on an educational institution&#039;s internal sports and fitness facilities where the Court found the venue was meant for students and faculty, not as a public recreation parlour or commercial entertainment space. The Tribunal also erred by sustaining the levy on wider concepts of entertainment and amusement when the notice had proceeded on a specific Section 4F basis, because a demand cannot be upheld on a ground beyond the notice. Once the foundational levy failed, the consequential interest and penalty also fell. The tax demands and related statutory liabilities were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2021 08:22:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=658852" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (10) TMI 762 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413710</link>
      <description>Entertainment tax under the Karnataka Entertainment Tax Act could not be imposed on an educational institution&#039;s internal sports and fitness facilities where the Court found the venue was meant for students and faculty, not as a public recreation parlour or commercial entertainment space. The Tribunal also erred by sustaining the levy on wider concepts of entertainment and amusement when the notice had proceeded on a specific Section 4F basis, because a demand cannot be upheld on a ground beyond the notice. Once the foundational levy failed, the consequential interest and penalty also fell. The tax demands and related statutory liabilities were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413710</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>