https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298183 Anticipatory bail was granted despite serious allegations because custodial interrogation was found unnecessary on the facts. The court noted that the occurrence was dated 11.11.2019, the other accused had already been arrested, surrendered and obtained bail, and confessional statements had been recorded. It also relied on the examination of 127 private witnesses, the lapse of substantial time since the occurrence and the earlier bail rejection, and the petitioner's age and willingness to cooperate. The prosecution's concerns about tampering with evidence or influencing witnesses were treated as addressable through bail conditions, so protection from arrest was allowed subject to conditions. en-us Tue, 24 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 19 Oct 2021 08:21:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298183 Anticipatory bail was granted despite serious allegations because custodial interrogation was found unnecessary on the facts. The court noted that the occurrence was dated 11.11.2019, the other accused had already been arrested, surrendered and obtained bail, and confessional statements had been recorded. It also relied on the examination of 127 private witnesses, the lapse of substantial time since the occurrence and the earlier bail rejection, and the petitioner's age and willingness to cooperate. The prosecution's concerns about tampering with evidence or influencing witnesses were treated as addressable through bail conditions, so protection from arrest was allowed subject to conditions. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 24 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298183