https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298187 The SC set aside the HC's grant of anticipatory bail to respondent No. 2, emphasizing that successive bail applications should not be entertained without substantial changes in circumstances. The SC criticized the HC for ignoring the Investigating Officer's report, which highlighted the need for custodial interrogation and an incomplete investigation. The SC ordered respondent No. 2's immediate custody, underscoring that bail should not be granted based on the mere passage of time or the accused's health condition when critical investigation aspects remain unresolved. This decision reinforces the necessity of prioritizing the integrity of the legal process and the progress of the investigation over the accused's convenience. en-us Thu, 28 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 23 Oct 2024 18:02:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298187 The SC set aside the HC's grant of anticipatory bail to respondent No. 2, emphasizing that successive bail applications should not be entertained without substantial changes in circumstances. The SC criticized the HC for ignoring the Investigating Officer's report, which highlighted the need for custodial interrogation and an incomplete investigation. The SC ordered respondent No. 2's immediate custody, underscoring that bail should not be granted based on the mere passage of time or the accused's health condition when critical investigation aspects remain unresolved. This decision reinforces the necessity of prioritizing the integrity of the legal process and the progress of the investigation over the accused's convenience. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 28 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298187