https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298176 Review jurisdiction under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC is confined to correction of an apparent error or consideration of genuinely new and important material that could not, despite due diligence, have been produced earlier. Additional documents will not justify review unless they were unavailable despite due diligence and are of such materiality that they would probably alter the result. A review cannot be used to supplement evidence or reopen concluded litigation on materials that merely might affect the outcome. The petitioner failed to establish any permissible ground for review, and the review petition was rejected. en-us Tue, 20 Feb 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 18 Oct 2021 15:46:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298176 Review jurisdiction under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC is confined to correction of an apparent error or consideration of genuinely new and important material that could not, despite due diligence, have been produced earlier. Additional documents will not justify review unless they were unavailable despite due diligence and are of such materiality that they would probably alter the result. A review cannot be used to supplement evidence or reopen concluded litigation on materials that merely might affect the outcome. The petitioner failed to establish any permissible ground for review, and the review petition was rejected. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 20 Feb 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298176