https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298175 Order 47, Rule 1 CPC was read broadly so that the phrase "for any other sufficient reason" can justify review in exceptional cases where strict adherence to the original decree would cause obvious injustice. On that footing, the trial court's review order was held to be within jurisdiction because it acted under its review powers after finding sufficient cause for non-compliance within time. Although an appeal lay against the review order under Order 43, Rule 1, its scope was confined by Order 47, Rule 7 CPC, and the objections raised did not fall within those restricted grounds. The review order was therefore sustained and the modified decree left undisturbed. en-us Fri, 12 Dec 1924 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 18 Oct 2021 15:43:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298175 Order 47, Rule 1 CPC was read broadly so that the phrase "for any other sufficient reason" can justify review in exceptional cases where strict adherence to the original decree would cause obvious injustice. On that footing, the trial court's review order was held to be within jurisdiction because it acted under its review powers after finding sufficient cause for non-compliance within time. Although an appeal lay against the review order under Order 43, Rule 1, its scope was confined by Order 47, Rule 7 CPC, and the objections raised did not fall within those restricted grounds. The review order was therefore sustained and the modified decree left undisturbed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 12 Dec 1924 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298175