<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (11) TMI 18 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26883</link>
    <description>Explanation 1 to Rule 2 of the Second Schedule to the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964 excludes reserves created by revaluation of book assets, but not a reserve reflecting a realised increase in asset value arising from devaluation-related gain. On the facts stated, the amount credited to reserve was not treated as a revaluation reserve and remained includible in the capital base. Rule 1(v) likewise applies broadly to moneys borrowed from any person in a country outside India; the term &quot;person&quot; was read with wide amplitude and was taken to include a foreign governmental department. The USAID loan was therefore includible in the capital base.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 11:18:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=65881" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (11) TMI 18 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26883</link>
      <description>Explanation 1 to Rule 2 of the Second Schedule to the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964 excludes reserves created by revaluation of book assets, but not a reserve reflecting a realised increase in asset value arising from devaluation-related gain. On the facts stated, the amount credited to reserve was not treated as a revaluation reserve and remained includible in the capital base. Rule 1(v) likewise applies broadly to moneys borrowed from any person in a country outside India; the term &quot;person&quot; was read with wide amplitude and was taken to include a foreign governmental department. The USAID loan was therefore includible in the capital base.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26883</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>