<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (10) TMI 725 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413673</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the ld. CIT (A) to delete the disallowance of expenses under section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 related to &#039;job charges&#039;. The Tribunal found that the increase in expenses was proportionate to the increase in turnover, and no discrepancies were identified in the books of accounts. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of providing specific reasons for disallowing expenses and declined to interfere with the order of the ld. CIT (A).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2021 09:28:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=658780" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (10) TMI 725 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413673</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the ld. CIT (A) to delete the disallowance of expenses under section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 related to &#039;job charges&#039;. The Tribunal found that the increase in expenses was proportionate to the increase in turnover, and no discrepancies were identified in the books of accounts. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of providing specific reasons for disallowing expenses and declined to interfere with the order of the ld. CIT (A).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413673</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>