<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (10) TMI 711 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , KOCHI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413659</link>
    <description>Status as a workman under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code is tested by reference to section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, requiring employment for manual, unskilled, skilled, technical, operational, clerical or supervisory work and exclusion by statutory exceptions. Consultant doctors engaged on fixed remuneration did not establish that they were full-time employees or that their names were borne on muster rolls. Their appointment letters described consultant engagement, payments were subject to tax deduction, no provident fund arrangement was shown, and no employment contract indicated a master-servant relationship. On that material, the liquidator&#039;s partial admission of their claims was not shown to be erroneous.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2021 09:28:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=658760" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (10) TMI 711 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , KOCHI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413659</link>
      <description>Status as a workman under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code is tested by reference to section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, requiring employment for manual, unskilled, skilled, technical, operational, clerical or supervisory work and exclusion by statutory exceptions. Consultant doctors engaged on fixed remuneration did not establish that they were full-time employees or that their names were borne on muster rolls. Their appointment letters described consultant engagement, payments were subject to tax deduction, no provident fund arrangement was shown, and no employment contract indicated a master-servant relationship. On that material, the liquidator&#039;s partial admission of their claims was not shown to be erroneous.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413659</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>