<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (10) TMI 703 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413651</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter to the original authority for a fresh decision, directing a thorough examination of disputed invoices and application of relevant judicial precedents and circulars. The adjudicating authority was instructed to expedite the decision within three months from the receipt of the order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2021 09:27:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=658750" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (10) TMI 703 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413651</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter to the original authority for a fresh decision, directing a thorough examination of disputed invoices and application of relevant judicial precedents and circulars. The adjudicating authority was instructed to expedite the decision within three months from the receipt of the order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413651</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>