<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (10) TMI 698 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413646</link>
    <description>The court held that the petitioners, as guarantors, could be classified as wilful defaulters even after the company was absolved of its liability. The Review Committee&#039;s decision was found to be reasoned and based on substantial evidence of fund diversion. The suppression of material facts by the petitioners further justified the dismissal of the writ petition. The court dismissed the writ petition without any order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Nov 2021 12:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=658743" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (10) TMI 698 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413646</link>
      <description>The court held that the petitioners, as guarantors, could be classified as wilful defaulters even after the company was absolved of its liability. The Review Committee&#039;s decision was found to be reasoned and based on substantial evidence of fund diversion. The suppression of material facts by the petitioners further justified the dismissal of the writ petition. The court dismissed the writ petition without any order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413646</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>