<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (10) TMI 674 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413622</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the Assessee&#039;s appeal and quashed the penalty order under Section 271(1)(c) due to the corresponding assessment order being quashed. The ITAT held that when additions in the assessment order are deleted, the penalty cannot stand alone and must be canceled, citing the precedent in K.C. Builders vs. ACIT. Therefore, the penalty levied by the Assessing Officer on 30.03.2016 was canceled.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2021 10:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=658667" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (10) TMI 674 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413622</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the Assessee&#039;s appeal and quashed the penalty order under Section 271(1)(c) due to the corresponding assessment order being quashed. The ITAT held that when additions in the assessment order are deleted, the penalty cannot stand alone and must be canceled, citing the precedent in K.C. Builders vs. ACIT. Therefore, the penalty levied by the Assessing Officer on 30.03.2016 was canceled.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413622</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>