<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (10) TMI 663 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413611</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals for A.Y. 2012-13 and A.Y. 2014-15 regarding penalties under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal ruled that once the additions/disallowances forming the basis for the penalties were deleted, the penalties could not be upheld independently. The decisions were based on the principle that if the additions were not sustained, the penalties imposed could not stand alone.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Oct 2021 09:06:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=658656" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (10) TMI 663 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413611</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals for A.Y. 2012-13 and A.Y. 2014-15 regarding penalties under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal ruled that once the additions/disallowances forming the basis for the penalties were deleted, the penalties could not be upheld independently. The decisions were based on the principle that if the additions were not sustained, the penalties imposed could not stand alone.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413611</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>