<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (10) TMI 648 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413596</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that the assessment completed without issuing a notice under section 143(2) was invalid, directing further consideration by the CIT(A). Emphasizing adherence to legal procedures, the Tribunal granted the assessee an opportunity to substantiate their case for a valid assessment. The reassessment proceedings initiated under section 147 were challenged, leading the Tribunal to instruct the CIT(A) to allow the assessee a final opportunity to present their case fairly. Concerns regarding the mechanical satisfaction under section 151 were raised, prompting the Tribunal to stress the need for a proper assessment process. The addition made under section 68 for unexplained credits was deemed unjustified, leading to a direction for reevaluation by the CIT(A).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Oct 2021 09:05:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=658641" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (10) TMI 648 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413596</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that the assessment completed without issuing a notice under section 143(2) was invalid, directing further consideration by the CIT(A). Emphasizing adherence to legal procedures, the Tribunal granted the assessee an opportunity to substantiate their case for a valid assessment. The reassessment proceedings initiated under section 147 were challenged, leading the Tribunal to instruct the CIT(A) to allow the assessee a final opportunity to present their case fairly. Concerns regarding the mechanical satisfaction under section 151 were raised, prompting the Tribunal to stress the need for a proper assessment process. The addition made under section 68 for unexplained credits was deemed unjustified, leading to a direction for reevaluation by the CIT(A).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413596</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>