<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (10) TMI 647 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413595</link>
    <description>The petition concerned a request for a detention certificate to secure waiver of demurrage charges for imported goods, linked to earlier proceedings on release of the consignment and one-time relaxation under the Plant Quarantine (Regulations of Import into India) Order, 2003. As the respondent stated that the earlier directions had been complied with, that an opinion had already been given, and that the competent customs officer had been approached to pass orders on the detention certificate and demurrage waiver, the Court found no need for a fresh mandamus. The matter was disposed of on the basis that the competent authority would process the consequential relief and pass the necessary orders promptly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2021 17:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=658640" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (10) TMI 647 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413595</link>
      <description>The petition concerned a request for a detention certificate to secure waiver of demurrage charges for imported goods, linked to earlier proceedings on release of the consignment and one-time relaxation under the Plant Quarantine (Regulations of Import into India) Order, 2003. As the respondent stated that the earlier directions had been complied with, that an opinion had already been given, and that the competent customs officer had been approached to pass orders on the detention certificate and demurrage waiver, the Court found no need for a fresh mandamus. The matter was disposed of on the basis that the competent authority would process the consequential relief and pass the necessary orders promptly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413595</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>