<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 1816 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298159</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax was not justified in invoking revision proceedings under Section 263 of the IT Act. The Tribunal found that the original assessment order, though erroneous, was not prejudicial to the Revenue&#039;s interests, rendering the revision order invalid. The Tribunal set aside the Principal CIT&#039;s order and pronounced the decision on 19th December 2017.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Oct 2021 09:02:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=658627" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 1816 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298159</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax was not justified in invoking revision proceedings under Section 263 of the IT Act. The Tribunal found that the original assessment order, though erroneous, was not prejudicial to the Revenue&#039;s interests, rendering the revision order invalid. The Tribunal set aside the Principal CIT&#039;s order and pronounced the decision on 19th December 2017.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298159</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>