https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298166 The Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 treats registration questions as falling within the Real Estate Regulatory Authority's domain, while the Adjudicating Officer's role is confined to compensation claims under the specified violation provisions. A phase that had obtained a part occupancy certificate within the statutory registration window was treated as completed for registration purposes and not as a registrable ongoing project under Section 3. On that basis, a complaint alleging defaults in relation to such a phase could not be entertained by the Adjudicating Officer, and directions on registration-related issues under Sections 3 and 31 were outside that officer's jurisdiction. en-us Mon, 01 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 16 Oct 2021 09:02:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298166 The Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 treats registration questions as falling within the Real Estate Regulatory Authority's domain, while the Adjudicating Officer's role is confined to compensation claims under the specified violation provisions. A phase that had obtained a part occupancy certificate within the statutory registration window was treated as completed for registration purposes and not as a registrable ongoing project under Section 3. On that basis, a complaint alleging defaults in relation to such a phase could not be entertained by the Adjudicating Officer, and directions on registration-related issues under Sections 3 and 31 were outside that officer's jurisdiction. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 01 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298166