https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413582 Interim bail did not amount to constructive custody for default-bail purposes because custody requires physical control, remand, or submission to the court's jurisdiction, and a person already released on bail cannot be treated as detained. On that basis, the default-bail claim failed. The court also held that a charge-sheet was not rendered incomplete merely because it referred to further evidence or possible additional material, since further evidence may still be collected or produced during investigation or trial under the criminal procedure framework. The petitioner was therefore not entitled to default bail on either ground, and the challenge to rejection of the bail application failed. en-us Tue, 05 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 27 Mar 2025 14:51:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413582 Interim bail did not amount to constructive custody for default-bail purposes because custody requires physical control, remand, or submission to the court's jurisdiction, and a person already released on bail cannot be treated as detained. On that basis, the default-bail claim failed. The court also held that a charge-sheet was not rendered incomplete merely because it referred to further evidence or possible additional material, since further evidence may still be collected or produced during investigation or trial under the criminal procedure framework. The petitioner was therefore not entitled to default bail on either ground, and the challenge to rejection of the bail application failed. Case-Laws GST Tue, 05 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413582