<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (10) TMI 600 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413548</link>
    <description>The Court acknowledged the existence of the original order-in-original against the petitioner and directed Customs to provide necessary documents for challenging it. The petitioner was granted the opportunity to contest the main order, with implications on subsequent orders. Emphasizing adherence to legal procedures, the Court disposed of the Writ Petition, underscoring the importance of proper service of notices and orders in legal challenges.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2021 09:14:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=658545" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (10) TMI 600 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413548</link>
      <description>The Court acknowledged the existence of the original order-in-original against the petitioner and directed Customs to provide necessary documents for challenging it. The petitioner was granted the opportunity to contest the main order, with implications on subsequent orders. Emphasizing adherence to legal procedures, the Court disposed of the Writ Petition, underscoring the importance of proper service of notices and orders in legal challenges.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413548</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>