<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (10) TMI 595 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , MUMBAI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413543</link>
    <description>A contractual claim for toll and ECC collection charges recoverable as arrears of tax under a municipal statute did not, by that recovery mechanism alone, become an operational debt under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code because the petitioner was not supplying goods or services to the corporate debtor. The Tribunal also found multiple prior proceedings, correspondence, and contested claims showing a real and plausible pre-existing dispute, so the section 9 petition was not maintainable. The application was therefore rejected because the underlying claim was not an operational debt and the dispute was substantial.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2021 09:14:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=658540" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (10) TMI 595 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , MUMBAI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413543</link>
      <description>A contractual claim for toll and ECC collection charges recoverable as arrears of tax under a municipal statute did not, by that recovery mechanism alone, become an operational debt under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code because the petitioner was not supplying goods or services to the corporate debtor. The Tribunal also found multiple prior proceedings, correspondence, and contested claims showing a real and plausible pre-existing dispute, so the section 9 petition was not maintainable. The application was therefore rejected because the underlying claim was not an operational debt and the dispute was substantial.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413543</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>