<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (10) TMI 583 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413531</link>
    <description>State legislative competence to levy UPVAT on Extra Neutral Alcohol, rectified spirit and SDS ceased after the 101st Constitution Amendment. As industrial, non-potable alcohol, these products fall within the GST framework because the constitutional exclusion applies only to alcoholic liquor for human consumption. The substituted State List entry preserves taxing power only for specified commodities, while the general regulatory entry relating to intoxicating liquors cannot support a tax levy. The UPGST saving provision did not preserve the earlier UPVAT regime for such alcohol. Consequently, a separate &quot;non-GST alcohol&quot; entry created by notification lacked legislative competence and valid delegation; the levy, assessments and notices were ultra vires, with refunds subject to unjust enrichment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2022 14:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=658528" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (10) TMI 583 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413531</link>
      <description>State legislative competence to levy UPVAT on Extra Neutral Alcohol, rectified spirit and SDS ceased after the 101st Constitution Amendment. As industrial, non-potable alcohol, these products fall within the GST framework because the constitutional exclusion applies only to alcoholic liquor for human consumption. The substituted State List entry preserves taxing power only for specified commodities, while the general regulatory entry relating to intoxicating liquors cannot support a tax levy. The UPGST saving provision did not preserve the earlier UPVAT regime for such alcohol. Consequently, a separate &quot;non-GST alcohol&quot; entry created by notification lacked legislative competence and valid delegation; the levy, assessments and notices were ultra vires, with refunds subject to unjust enrichment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413531</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>