https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413529 In cheque dishonour proceedings, inherent jurisdiction will not be used to quash a complaint and summoning order where the challenge turns on disputed questions of fact, the material discloses a prima facie case, and the matter does not fall within recognised quashing categories. The complaint was therefore not quashed. At the same time, the court noted the compensatory object of cheque dishonour law and granted the accused a limited, time-bound opportunity to seek compromise and compounding before the trial court, with coercive steps kept in abeyance for that period. Limited interim protection was thus allowed to facilitate settlement. en-us Mon, 04 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 13 Oct 2021 18:43:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413529 In cheque dishonour proceedings, inherent jurisdiction will not be used to quash a complaint and summoning order where the challenge turns on disputed questions of fact, the material discloses a prima facie case, and the matter does not fall within recognised quashing categories. The complaint was therefore not quashed. At the same time, the court noted the compensatory object of cheque dishonour law and granted the accused a limited, time-bound opportunity to seek compromise and compounding before the trial court, with coercive steps kept in abeyance for that period. Limited interim protection was thus allowed to facilitate settlement. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 04 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413529