<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 1769 - ITAT SURAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298150</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that the addition of Rs. 8,01,93,887/- for alleged bogus purchases was unjustified. The Tribunal found that the documentary evidence provided by the assessee, including purchase invoices, stock registers, and confirmations, was reliable and not disputed by the authorities. Therefore, the Tribunal set aside the lower authorities&#039; orders and deleted the entire addition, ruling in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2021 09:13:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=658523" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 1769 - ITAT SURAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298150</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that the addition of Rs. 8,01,93,887/- for alleged bogus purchases was unjustified. The Tribunal found that the documentary evidence provided by the assessee, including purchase invoices, stock registers, and confirmations, was reliable and not disputed by the authorities. Therefore, the Tribunal set aside the lower authorities&#039; orders and deleted the entire addition, ruling in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298150</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>