<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (5) TMI 1000 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298157</link>
    <description>Writ petition was closed with liberty to renew the application after the first respondent&#039;s decision, while interim protection against coercive steps concerning demurrage and detention charges was directed to continue until then. The operative effect is that the petitioner may return to court after the pending decision, and coercive recovery measures remain stayed in the meantime.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2021 09:13:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=658511" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (5) TMI 1000 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298157</link>
      <description>Writ petition was closed with liberty to renew the application after the first respondent&#039;s decision, while interim protection against coercive steps concerning demurrage and detention charges was directed to continue until then. The operative effect is that the petitioner may return to court after the pending decision, and coercive recovery measures remain stayed in the meantime.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298157</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>