<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (7) TMI 59 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26853</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court clarified that a coparcener cannot be a partner with the karta of a Hindu undivided family using family assets, unless they have individual assets. The High Court mandated the Tribunal to refer questions on the validity of the partnership and the legal bar on the karta entering a partnership with a coparcener for further legal opinion due to the interconnected nature of the registration for two assessment years.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 18:52:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=65851" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (7) TMI 59 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26853</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court clarified that a coparcener cannot be a partner with the karta of a Hindu undivided family using family assets, unless they have individual assets. The High Court mandated the Tribunal to refer questions on the validity of the partnership and the legal bar on the karta entering a partnership with a coparcener for further legal opinion due to the interconnected nature of the registration for two assessment years.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26853</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>