https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298136 Preventive detention was upheld where the detention order had been reported and approved in time, so the statutory requirement of prompt reporting was satisfied. Non-supply of a later report did not vitiate detention because it was only referential, not a basis of detention, and no prejudice to an effective representation was shown. Alleged delay in executing the order was explained by the detenu's evasion and continued efforts to apprehend him, so the live link was not broken. The activities attributed to the detenu were treated as sufficiently grave and within the statutory concept of a goonda, supporting detention. en-us Tue, 08 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 13 Oct 2021 15:18:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298136 Preventive detention was upheld where the detention order had been reported and approved in time, so the statutory requirement of prompt reporting was satisfied. Non-supply of a later report did not vitiate detention because it was only referential, not a basis of detention, and no prejudice to an effective representation was shown. Alleged delay in executing the order was explained by the detenu's evasion and continued efforts to apprehend him, so the live link was not broken. The activities attributed to the detenu were treated as sufficiently grave and within the statutory concept of a goonda, supporting detention. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 08 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298136