https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298135 In preventive detention, non-supply of vital documents and non-placement of relevant material before the detaining authority can violate Article 22(5) by denying the detenu an effective representation, and the detention cannot stand where subjective satisfaction is formed without considering all material bearing on the grounds. The public order test turns on whether the act disturbs the even tempo of community life: conduct affecting only particular individuals remains a law and order issue, while incidents with wider public impact, such as firing in a public place causing panic, may satisfy the public order threshold. The article states that the detention was unsustainable because constitutional safeguards were breached, although two incidents were found to concern public order. en-us Fri, 06 Nov 1987 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 13 Oct 2021 15:17:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298135 In preventive detention, non-supply of vital documents and non-placement of relevant material before the detaining authority can violate Article 22(5) by denying the detenu an effective representation, and the detention cannot stand where subjective satisfaction is formed without considering all material bearing on the grounds. The public order test turns on whether the act disturbs the even tempo of community life: conduct affecting only particular individuals remains a law and order issue, while incidents with wider public impact, such as firing in a public place causing panic, may satisfy the public order threshold. The article states that the detention was unsustainable because constitutional safeguards were breached, although two incidents were found to concern public order. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 06 Nov 1987 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298135