<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (10) TMI 578 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413526</link>
    <description>The court concluded that the return filed within the specified time under Section 62(2) should be considered valid, leading to the withdrawal of best judgment assessment orders for various periods. The impugned endorsement was set aside, and the court directed the processing of the return filed under Section 62(2) in accordance with the law, ensuring the correct application of statutory provisions and court orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2025 16:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=658465" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (10) TMI 578 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413526</link>
      <description>The court concluded that the return filed within the specified time under Section 62(2) should be considered valid, leading to the withdrawal of best judgment assessment orders for various periods. The impugned endorsement was set aside, and the court directed the processing of the return filed under Section 62(2) in accordance with the law, ensuring the correct application of statutory provisions and court orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413526</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>