<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (10) TMI 564 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413512</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the income from leasing a commercial complex and providing amenities should be treated as &quot;business income&quot; rather than &quot;income from house property.&quot; The Tribunal relied on the assessee&#039;s main object in the Memorandum of Association, the systematic business activities, and judicial precedents. The appeal by the Revenue was dismissed, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2021 08:44:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=658451" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (10) TMI 564 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413512</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the income from leasing a commercial complex and providing amenities should be treated as &quot;business income&quot; rather than &quot;income from house property.&quot; The Tribunal relied on the assessee&#039;s main object in the Memorandum of Association, the systematic business activities, and judicial precedents. The appeal by the Revenue was dismissed, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413512</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>